How we measure, and why there are no scores here
Every timing on this site describes a payment rail, not a promise from an operator. This page sets out where each kind of fact comes from, how the weighting behind our one comparative claim works, and what we do when a fact cannot be read anywhere.
Where the timings come from
From the structure of the rails themselves. Cryptocurrency settles when the network confirms — minutes, by construction. Card payouts pass through the card network and the issuing bank — the banking day, by construction. Wallet transfers depend on a processor agreement that varies by operator, so for wallets we publish no figure at all.
Operator-specific figures — payout windows, limits, verification order — are taken from what the operator itself publishes: cashier rules, terms, the site footer. Where an operator publishes a window, we quote it as theirs, the way the lilbet page quotes the 0–24 hour window. Where an operator publishes nothing, the absence is reported as a fact, the way the Mostbet page reports the absence of a single window and the 1win page reports an unnamed operating company.
Each page carries one visible «Updated» date, which covers everything on it. Operators change cashier details on their own schedule, so the current binding source is always the cashier of your own account — every page here says so where it matters.
The weighting behind «who pays fastest»
This site makes one comparative claim — which operator gets money to a player in Bangladesh fastest — and the weighting below is how it is reached. Speed of arrival dominates because speed is the question this site exists to answer; catalogue and bonuses barely register because they do not move money.
| Criterion | Weight | Why this much |
|---|---|---|
| Speed of arrival | 40% | The site's question, literally |
| Range of withdrawal methods | 25% | A method that is missing zeroes out everything else |
| Transparency of conditions | 20% | Limits, fees and verification order — where surprises live |
| Operator and paperwork | 10% | Matters, but affects payouts indirectly |
| Catalogue and bonuses | 5% | Nearly irrelevant to money leaving |
On this weighting lilbet currently sits first: its confirmed crypto channel clears in minutes and its card payouts land inside the operator's published window. That is a payout-speed verdict only. A reader who weighs track record first will rank differently, and the facts for doing so are published.
Why no scores?
A score compresses many judgements into one number and hides the weighting that produced it. This site keeps the weighting visible and the facts separate, so a reader with different priorities can reuse the facts and reject our emphasis. A number would only get in the way of that.
The same reasoning applies to third-party ratings and complaint counts: we neither quote nor aggregate them. A complaint is only meaningful once you know which brand, which stage and which rule was involved — the brand-confusion page shows how often the answer to «which brand» is «a different one than the search suggested».
What happens when a fact cannot be verified
It does not appear. Where an operator's own pages do not state wallet support, we write «check the cashier of your account» rather than guessing. Where a company name is missing, we say the name is missing. The rule is symmetrical: it protects readers from invented reassurance and operators from invented criticism.